From nobody Mon Mar 13 18:10:38 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Pb4TJ5VvJz3y1gk for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:10:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pb4TH5hmvz4SYj for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=rRHKRZG1; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="q p0YQVl"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 64.147.123.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B2D3200893 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:10:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:10:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1678731041; x=1678817441; bh=Yn7pKf1XX29sHZoHG2Hpgp47aDFS0e+GG5V a7fqemTQ=; b=rRHKRZG1p0hGmD47JJI+kyFlEgOOUp1jqQo+vxvJuAvTAserK5j sp3Br5Eyj9VsDo1Z0jBaganI6l1h4m5nT70Xs0TsQiuUYdfjwyBzHAOpDA/e3/1T rC/BIydiqycXRrlp9X3wMMmVPdmlp6QUOx/SSIKzeJZ4y8AdH5dnpQJyiv/8jjUI Av4Aj0cjXYjYg2xk4lCC8K1CmWLKXXEXI1AbVPx2v0QGouJ0N2hKXe96y67y/cGF VuSKriiAip4N7d06xLXmVreOQeze2Ctv/+cqxHD5rkx61qgVOoD8zm2qssn6ylHp e6UKM3yhAolTZQPOT8Axg6eZBPmLiE6YkBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1678731041; x= 1678817441; bh=Yn7pKf1XX29sHZoHG2Hpgp47aDFS0e+GG5Va7fqemTQ=; b=q p0YQVlu8hAUA9ViRXWwMUP8rGVFHB5f9sEcSfk7Bd+M51Qi9CI3t1cBaInpVJp4E gP5F2PnDKubLQvbDxD30tfZzlwucAO84rkUwQD/k/BjngHG9Hu9kFEc7yrX+mYI0 PHlvfrS3MFkk/UpSy2V3EuWPjHlINxOIjEFBRHmm0kv39Mh4ptIjkw00WTAG8wGZ nNC/jnCZ7BQH6t3uGpwCFO3D6Hh7FLWUMnig0Nqhb4N3VO8NHwry66e+q/gsKoi+ 6wB2iypdc0P6ZJd8Q+EMPAp4aRVyrorQd1huEWM+IZTUNH1YbrPC/GOOMzWG/Y1o UW/JYu07F88Peq9flfUvg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvddvgedguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesth ekredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmheqnecuggft rfgrthhtvghrnhepkedvjeeitdejheekieekkeeiuddtffdvudetheevgeeijeehtdfffe eggeektdefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepvhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:10:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:10:38 +0000 From: void To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <9df2ec48-aacd-e2c4-04b6-8cba90a237be@sentex.net> List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <9df2ec48-aacd-e2c4-04b6-8cba90a237be@sentex.net> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.59 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.994]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.19]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.19:from]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29838, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Pb4TH5hmvz4SYj X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:29:33PM -0400, mike tancsa wrote: >On 3/13/2023 12:22 PM, void wrote: >> The system is a HP ProLiant dual Xeon E5-2690 v2, so there are 40 "cpus" >> ie 20 if hyperthreading is turned off, in total. >> >> I was kind of surprised this didn't work out-of-the-box considering >> the age of the cpu, its use-context and how widely it was/is used >> in that context. Clearly I'm doing something wrong or missing something. >> >> Should it work? >> >Is the hw pstate taking precedence perhaps ? What does > >sysctl -a dev.hwpstate_intel > >show ? Think I might have found the answer in est(4): ### est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.   est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 471c471c0600471c   device_attach: est%d attach returned 6   Indicates all attempts to attach to this interface have failed. This usually indicates an improper BIOS setting restricting O/S control of the CPU speeds. Consult your BIOS documentation for more details. ### so the next problem is out-of-band access, so not a freebsd problem. Sorry for the noise. --