RE: Very slow scp performance comparing to Linux
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: Very slow scp performance comparing to Linux"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 19:52:52 UTC
Wei Hu <weh_at_microsoft.com> wrote on Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 12:55:35 UTC : > Thanks for the update. Seems the numbers are the same on zfs and ufs. That's > good to know. > > Yes, your numbers on ARM64 are better than mine on Intel. However, my original > intention was to find out why scp on Linux is performing much better than FreeBSD > under the same hardware env. > > Is it possible to try Linux in your ARM64 setting? I am using Ubuntu 22.04 on ext4 > file system. I tried to use the Hyper-V Quick Create on the Windows Dev Kit 2023 to install a Ubuntu 22.04 . (No clue if ext4 would result.) But the Hyper-V UEFI reports for the disk created: 1. SCSI Disk 0,0 The boot loader did not load an operating system. (It then reports the network adapter attempt found no boot image, but that is expected.) That leaves me wondering if Hyper-V Quick Create established a VM file holding Intel/AMD material despite the aarch64 context. Establishing a Ubuntu more directly is not familiar and will have to be a background activity and, so, likely will not be timely. If I did any experiments outside Hyper-V (native booting), they would be with slower USB3 SSD media than I use for FreeBSD. I did notice that Hyper-V Quick Create did not create a fixed sized disk but a dynamic sized one. That is different than what I did for FreeBSD. Also, it was not obvious if you were after aarch64 Hyper-V testing vs. native-boot testing vs. both. So I may have gone the wrong direction from the start. It is possible that I'd find establishing a native-boot easier and then be able to have a VM file created from the media, more like what I did with FreeBSD. The Ubuntu activity likely would not be analogous to the FreeBSD builds having -mcpu= optimization used. Back to $work. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com