From nobody Mon Aug 28 14:01:56 2023
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RZC0r2GWwz4rZnq;
	Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:02:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "smarthost1.sentex.ca", Issuer "R3" (verified OK))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RZC0r0Cq3z4MqG;
	Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:02:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (pyroxene19.sentex.ca [199.212.134.19])
	by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 37SE1udR081946
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);
	Mon, 28 Aug 2023 10:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from [IPV6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5558:f64a:f719:8ead] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5558:f64a:f719:8ead])
	by pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 37SE1uP0028691
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Mon, 28 Aug 2023 10:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-ID: <73af5253-55ba-13d1-6d31-9bc96233e7d5@sentex.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 10:01:56 -0400
List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-hackers+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-hackers+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.14.0
Subject: Re: Very slow scp performance comparing to Linux
Content-Language: en-US
To: Wei Hu <weh@microsoft.com>,
        "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
References: <SI2P153MB0441858EC3FE24D5B7A6B34DBBE0A@SI2P153MB0441.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <SI2P153MB0441858EC3FE24D5B7A6B34DBBE0A@SI2P153MB0441.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 64.7.153.18
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RZC0r0Cq3z4MqG

On 8/28/2023 3:32 AM, Wei Hu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I was testing a new NIC, I found the single stream scp performance was almost 8 time slower than Linux on the RX side. Initially I thought it might be something with the NIC. But when I switched to sending the file on localhost, the numbers stay the same.
>
Just curious, how does iperf3 perform in comparison ?

     ---Mike