Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?"
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:36:17 UTC
23.06.2022 22:26, Warner Losh wrote: > Giant is being removed entirely, and with it all straggler drivers that aren't converted by the removal date. > There's no fixed date for this, at the present time, but I'm about to commit changes that make it impossible > for new code to reference Giant. Having Giant, at all, causes slow downs elsewhere in the system, which > is why we're pushing to remove it entirely. Why is it better to lose working code then to keep it "slow"?