Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?
- Reply: Eugene Grosbein : "Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?"
- In reply to: Steve Kargl : "Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 05:34:21 UTC
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 10:59 PM Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:55:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 9:47 PM Stefan Blachmann <sblachmann@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I would kindly ask to stop pushing for removal of sc. > > > > > > > It will die soon enough if it doesn't become giant locked soon... > > > > Warner > > > > Are you deleting vt, too? > The project likely has resources to remove giant from only one console driver. That will almost certainly be vt. Warner > % grep -i giant /var/run/dmesg.boot > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > WARNING: Device "fb" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD > 14.0. > lock order reversal: (Giant after non-sleepable) > 2nd 0xffffffff80c02840 Giant (Giant, sleep mutex) @ > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:232 > lock order Giant -> vtdev established at: > lock order vtdev -> Giant attempted at: > > -- > Steve >