Re: Canonical way / best practice for 128-bit integers
- In reply to: Eugene Grosbein : "Re: Canonical way / best practice for 128-bit integers"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:09:03 UTC
Hello Eugene, > On 9 Jul 2022, at 21:27, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> wrote: > > 09.07.2022 23:26, Marc Veldman wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I’m working on some bluetooth code, and that involves handling 128-bit uuids. >> There are various ways to handle in the FreeBSD codebase, like in sdp.h: >> Is there any recommended / standard way to handle 128 bit integers in a portable way? > > UUIDs are not integer numbers with arithmetic, so you should not look for 128 bit ints, if you need portability. In Bluetooth, not quite. Bluetooth also has 32-bit and 16-bit “UUID aliases”, which can require some arithmetic/bitshifting. > For example, 32 bit i386 arch lacks hardware support for 128 bit ints, > so FreeBSD does not support 128 bit ints with arithmetic for i386 > but it does not mean that you cannot use 128 bit UUIDs there. > > We have uuid(3) manual for DCE 1.1 compliant UUID type uuid_t and functions. That looks like a good candidate to have a look at. Thanks! Best regards, Marc Veldman