Re: [PATCH 0/6] Simplify pps_capture() and pps_event()
- Reply: Sebastian Huber : "Re: [PATCH 0/6] Simplify pps_capture() and pps_event()"
- Reply: Sebastian Huber : "Re: [PATCH 0/6] Simplify pps_capture() and pps_event()"
- In reply to: Sebastian Huber : "[PATCH 0/6] Simplify pps_capture() and pps_event()"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:52:49 UTC
You might have better luck getting these patches reviewed with either a pull request against github mentioning the usual time people (phk, etc), or as a series of phabricator reviews adding said people. If unsure, mention/add me and I'll add others :). Hackers is (or has been) a high enough volume list that this may not be noticed by those people, especially since there's not a strong tradition of reviewing patches here. On their surface (without having had time to study them in depth), these seem reasonable improvements. But having some context about why you are making these, and/or measurements you've done to show no harm (or hopefully an improvement) would be even better. This is slightly tricky code that has had about 20 years of "soak time" in some fairly demanding environments, and so some caution is advised in updating it. Warner On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > This patch set tries to simplify the pps_capture() and pps_event() > processing. > I am not sure if the rounding change is an improvement. > > Sebastian Huber (6): > pps: Load timecounter once in pps_capture() > pps: Simplify capture and event processing > pps: Move pcount assignment in pps_event() > pps: Directly assign the timestamps in pps_event() > pps: Simplify the nsec calculation in pps_event() > pps: Round to closest integer in pps_event() > > sys/kern/kern_tc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.35.3 > > >