Re: ntp_init() looks like a nop
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: ntp_init() looks like a nop"
- In reply to: Sebastian Huber : "ntp_init() looks like a nop"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:18:29 UTC
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:04:56PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I review currently the kern_ntptime.c module since I would like to use it in > RTEMS. I have a question to ntp_init(): > > /* > * ntp_init() - initialize variables and structures > * > * This routine must be called after the kernel variables hz and tick > * are set or changed and before the next tick interrupt. In this > * particular implementation, these values are assumed set elsewhere in > * the kernel. The design allows the clock frequency and tick interval > * to be changed while the system is running. So, this routine should > * probably be integrated with the code that does that. > */ > static void > ntp_init(void) > { > > /* > * The following variables are initialized only at startup. Only > * those structures not cleared by the compiler need to be > * initialized, and these only in the simulator. In the actual > * kernel, any nonzero values here will quickly evaporate. > */ > L_CLR(time_offset); > L_CLR(time_freq); > #ifdef PPS_SYNC > pps_tf[0].tv_sec = pps_tf[0].tv_nsec = 0; > pps_tf[1].tv_sec = pps_tf[1].tv_nsec = 0; > pps_tf[2].tv_sec = pps_tf[2].tv_nsec = 0; > pps_fcount = 0; > L_CLR(pps_freq); > #endif /* PPS_SYNC */ > } > > SYSINIT(ntpclocks, SI_SUB_CLOCKS, SI_ORDER_MIDDLE, ntp_init, NULL); > > The ntp_init() function sets a couple of global variables to zero. These > variables should be in the .bss section. Are they not already cleared during > the kernel loading? This is nop indeed, be it linked in kernel, or loaded as a module.