Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?

In reply to: Eugene Grosbein : "Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen_at_grosbein.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:10:59 UTC

26.11.2021 22:59, Eugene Grosbein wrote:

> sc(4) is still better quality for BIOS-based systems or EFI-based with CSM legacy mode working.
> sc(4) is better to such an extent FreeBSD's unusable with vt(4) for some fresh systems being sold
> but boots and works fine with sc(4). An example with many people complaining:
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230172

Sorry, not completly "unusable" (it seems manual work-around exists) but without knowledge of obscure work-around
one cannot use the hardware with vt(4) and FreeBSD versions 11.2+ (11.1-RELEASE was last one working out of the box).