Re: pondering pi futexes

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:01:17AM +0300, Dmitry Chagin wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the reply, I mostly finished,
> the new futex impl is fully based on the umtx code, one question before review.
> some umtx API, which is needed for futexes, inlined, like
> umtxq_busy/unbusy, umtxq_lock/unlock, umtx_pi_alloc/pi_free,  etc.. 
> For now I moved such API to the umtx header, but as far as I understand
> compilers are smart enough now to optimize code without suggestions.
> Maybe it's time to drop inline hint?
> 
May be.  It is impossible to provide a justified answer without looking
at the generated code, with/without inline.  But usually yes, inline does
not make a difference for not too large static functions.