Re: madvise(MADV_FREE) doesn't work in some cases?
- In reply to: Konstantin Belousov : "Re: madvise(MADV_FREE) doesn't work in some cases?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 22:51:00 UTC
> On 12 Jul 2021, at 22:52, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 02:55:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote: >> I guess madvise() should work well even with PAGE_SIZE granularity. Usually a caller doesn’t need to free the whole region. As I reported earlier madvise(PAGE_SIZE) works well in Linux and illumos. >> >> Current behaviour in FreeBSD can confuse programmers and brings impossibility to effectively give back unused memory. Also I have another case with madvise() but with shared memory that also doesn’t work (but works in Linux and illumos), will report it in new thread. >> > > I want the confirmation or report that it still did not worked, for the > case when my latest patch was applied and the test program switched to > the single call to madvise(2) for the whole region. > Understood, checked. Patched kernel with single call of madvise(len, MADV_FREE) from userspace still doesn’t work. The same condition if (obj->backing_object != NULL) is met, but once. —— Vitaliy Gusev > After that, I can claim that the problem is understood and might consider > some solutions.