Re: What to do about tgammal?

Reply: Marc Fonvieille : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
In reply to: Marc Fonvieille : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:48:19 UTC

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:15:53AM +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>
> I assume what Steve is talking about is the corresponding value in
> decimal of the number of ULP.
> 

Bad assumption.  Please read Goldberg's paper.  I am talking
about ULP in the underlying floating point format.

-- 
Steve