Re: What to do about tgammal?
- Reply: Steve Kargl : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
- In reply to: Mark Murray : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 22:47:17 UTC
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:23 PM Mark Murray <markm@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 14 Dec 2021, at 21:51, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > wrote: > > Interval max ULP x at Max ULP > > [6,1755.1] 0.873414 at 1.480588145237629047468e+03 > > [1.0662,6] 0.861508 at 1.999467927053585410537e+00 > > [1.01e-17,1.0661] 0.938041 at 1.023286481537296307856e+00 > > [-1.9999,-1.0001] 3.157770 at -1.246957268051453610329e+00 > > [-2.9999,-2.0001] 2.987659 at -2.220949465449893090070e+00 > > > > Note, 1.01e-17 can be reduced to soemthing like 1.01e-19 or > > Extra diffs most welcome! > Those results have allayed my fears. Is 1e-17 sufficient to commit these changes, or do we need to work to get it down to 1e-19 for it to be acceptable? Warner