Re: Call for Foundation-supported Project Ideas

From: Chris <bsd-lists_at_bsdforge.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:22:44 UTC
Sorry for the top-post.
Phoronix recently created a comparison: Linux vs BSD[1]
Given they know little about the BSD's. The competition was pretty biased 
towards
the Linux's.
It would be great if the Foundation could produce a similar completion that 
was
more correctly/fairly weighted. It would be great for (BSD) 
Promotion/Advertising/Evangelism.
If done well. It would give better credence to the sponsored tests making it 
the "defacto"
test/comparison. Which should also show FreeBSD in a better light. As opposed 
to all the
other tests performed by Linux users with little-to-no-knowledge of the 
BSD's.

-- Chris

1. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=bsd-linux-eo2021&num=1

On 2021-12-10 21:38, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> freebsd-pf: matching and logging receive interface and xmit interface
> in single rule (ipfw has support)
> 
> I'm looking for a solution to match a traffic received on igb0 and xmit on 
> igb1.
> According to man page, ipfw(8) supports this syntax:
> 
> ipfw add deny ip from any to any out recv ed0 xmit ed1
> 
>      The recv interface can be tested on either incoming or outgoing
>      packets, while the xmit interface can only be tested on outgoing
>      packets.  So out is required (and in is invalid) whenever xmit is
>      used.
> 
> Is it possible to add support to pf for this feature like ipfw?
> 
> Have a nice day
> 
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Lars Engels <lme@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Am 2021-12-09 19:25, schrieb Özkan KIRIK:
>> > bsnmpd: monitoring jails (event with different vnet) resources like
>> > interfaces, cpu usage etc.
>> >
>> > I don't have an account to modify wiki. thanks
>> 
>> 
>> I added this to the wiki page.
>>