Re: Call for Foundation-supported Project Ideas
- In reply to: Özkan KIRIK : "Re: Call for Foundation-supported Project Ideas"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:22:44 UTC
Sorry for the top-post. Phoronix recently created a comparison: Linux vs BSD[1] Given they know little about the BSD's. The competition was pretty biased towards the Linux's. It would be great if the Foundation could produce a similar completion that was more correctly/fairly weighted. It would be great for (BSD) Promotion/Advertising/Evangelism. If done well. It would give better credence to the sponsored tests making it the "defacto" test/comparison. Which should also show FreeBSD in a better light. As opposed to all the other tests performed by Linux users with little-to-no-knowledge of the BSD's. -- Chris 1. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=bsd-linux-eo2021&num=1 On 2021-12-10 21:38, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > freebsd-pf: matching and logging receive interface and xmit interface > in single rule (ipfw has support) > > I'm looking for a solution to match a traffic received on igb0 and xmit on > igb1. > According to man page, ipfw(8) supports this syntax: > > ipfw add deny ip from any to any out recv ed0 xmit ed1 > > The recv interface can be tested on either incoming or outgoing > packets, while the xmit interface can only be tested on outgoing > packets. So out is required (and in is invalid) whenever xmit is > used. > > Is it possible to add support to pf for this feature like ipfw? > > Have a nice day > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Lars Engels <lme@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> Am 2021-12-09 19:25, schrieb Özkan KIRIK: >> > bsnmpd: monitoring jails (event with different vnet) resources like >> > interfaces, cpu usage etc. >> > >> > I don't have an account to modify wiki. thanks >> >> >> I added this to the wiki page. >>