Re: Is snp(4) in working order?
- Reply: Gary Jennejohn : "Re: Is snp(4) in working order?"
- In reply to: Bertrand Petit : "Is snp(4) in working order?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:14:49 UTC
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:12:24PM +0200, Bertrand Petit wrote: > > I'm wondering if, on a 12.2 host, the snp(4) device is out of order or > if I'm improperly using it. > > Here is the situation: a GPS receiver connected to the host through > USB (umodem driver) feeding ntpd and keeping it happy. On this setup I perform > the following calls as root in a dedicated process: > > int a=open("/dev/cuaU0", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK); > isatty(a); /* Yes it is */ > int b=open("/dev/snp", O_RDONLY); > ioctl(b, SNPSTTY, &a); > int pending; ioctl(b, FIONREAD, &pending); /* Empty */ > char buf; read(b, 1, &buf); > > I ommited error handling for brevity, all calls are successfull except read() > which never return. > > I expected to be able to read the same bytes stream as ntpd does but I > get nothing. Am I misusing the snp(4) interface or is it non-functioning? > > [As a side note: I could also had used gpsd but hooking ntpd directly > to the serial device yields a far better jitter.] Did you tried watch(8) first? I just used watch successfully over /dev/pts/N pseudoterminal.