From nobody Mon Sep 09 13:02:00 0024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2P9n4yZ3z5W3np for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 11:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ske-89@pkmab.se) Received: from mail1.bemta32.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta32.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail1.bemta32.messagelabs.com", Issuer "DigiCert TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X2P9m48hJz3xp6 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ske-89@pkmab.se) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ske-89@pkmab.se designates 195.245.230.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ske-89@pkmab.se X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrBLMWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsVyYCl7k67HtXt pBlu3WVls3/yP0YHRY8an+SwBjFGsmXlJ+RUJrBnn1m1iLpjMXLH4xkWWBsbTTF2MXBxCAtMZ JWZsXgDlLGCUeD97NVsXIycHm4CoxL7uu8wgtrCAnsSqPZ9Zuxg5OEQE5CUWnLcHCXMK2Eocb lkPVs4ioCjx7epjMJtXwFRi7urbTCC2kICMxKVFx9hBbAmBYInOi2+YJzByLWBkWMVoWpxaVJ ZapGupl1SUmZ5RkpuYmaOXWKWbqJdaqlueWlyia6iXWF6sl1pcrFdcmZuck6KXl1qyiRHo4ZR iluYdjOuvNuofYpTkYFIS5f3XeC9NiC8pP6UyI7E4I76oNCe1+BCjDAeHkgRvxQWgnGBRanpq RVpmDjDYYNISHDxKIrxGR4HSvMUFibnFmekQqVOMilLivPlXgBICIImM0jy4NliAX2KUlRLmZ WRgYBDiKUgtys0sQZV/xSjOwagkzNsMMoUnM68EbvoroMVMQIv1dO6CLC5JREhJNTCV7y9aUv h8a51Q7kxeO9eAZZ4Hsz56mDtuuiefePHfidNsnJtSpHdYB57Q/S49JTQySVe99c9FeeW5wn4 tn05WtCoWnGgrVWSYlZS4dfOLylUMdRNz5r46Krfy5COOR9esr3es4Okyb3u7xVikM3rPswmn 7HUK1YVD7VZffMFrevrQqUm9Gi19H/Ne+n78OfOdrzBzbLqLZ2jE77qkQ2aRn3O7575bvUPo3 Fa5qI47Cj/sviTMkplX3vhgyt+k+pmPWqr3Xu3cHa/jMue0Votf2NETqcHbW6qfvTkVHfb9YL COsE/Bo9Zb2jM9U4TlF6774nFL0bV0wt+nfFxMyyWvrudbkXb2f6yk9rGuabZKLMUZiYZazEX FiQDFjEp06wIAAA== X-Env-Sender: ske-89@pkmab.se X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-564.messagelabs.com!1725879880!14195!1 X-Originating-IP: [192.165.7.130] X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: outbound-route-from=fail X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 9.114.1; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 6554 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2024 11:04:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO PSY-APP020.precio.lan) (192.165.7.130) by server-2.tower-564.messagelabs.com with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 9 Sep 2024 11:04:40 -0000 Received: from berenice.precio.lan ([172.27.68.201]) by PSY-APP020.precio.lan with Microsoft SMTPSVC(10.0.17763.1697); Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:04:40 +0200 Received: from pkmab.se by berenice.pkmab.se with uucp id aa20239 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:04:40 +0200 (CETDST) From: ske-89@pkmab.se Subject: Re: The Case for Rust (in any system) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <202409060825.4868PDWO042319@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 24 13:02:00 GMT Message-ID: <202409091304.aa20239@berenice.pkmab.se> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2024 11:04:40.0171 (UTC) FILETIME=[1111EBB0:01DB02A8] X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.37 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.974]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.905]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:195.245.230.0/23]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:195.245.230.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[195.245.230.1:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pkmab.se]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[195.245.230.1:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X2P9m48hJz3xp6 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org On 6 Sep 2024 8:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > The C-stewardship situation has become increasingly intolerable to > me, and I have practically already made up my mind, that Varnish > Cache will migrate to a defined subset of C++, roughly corresponding > to where I think C should have been by now. What might that subset be? And how come Varnish Cache started out using C at all?