From nobody Thu Apr 07 21:44:56 2022 X-Original-To: gnome@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B51A8C51E for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.100.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KZFKX6XGrz3rQW; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPV6:2a02:908:1464:1280:f68c:50ff:fe3d:317d] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:1464:1280:f68c:50ff:fe3d:317d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 815EF190898; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 23:44:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <822e6f2b-9dfb-c6d8-a96e-a84145470bbe@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 23:44:56 +0200 List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-gnome List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Subject: Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: deskutils/gnome-clocks, devel/ph... Content-Language: en-US To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Cc: bofh@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, Piotr Kubaj , Matthias Fechner , Jan Beich References: <202204071303.237D3Qqh014330@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff In-Reply-To: <202204071303.237D3Qqh014330@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KZFKX6XGrz3rQW X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Aloha, this grepped my attention, since i had not touched them. ;) > - *devel/php74-intl* : php74-intl-7.4.28_1 < php74-intl-7.4.28_2 > (master: lang/php74) > > - *devel/php80-intl* : php80-intl-8.0.17_1 < php80-intl-8.0.17_2 > (master: lang/php80) > > - *devel/php81-intl* : php81-intl-8.1.4_1 < php81-intl-8.1.4_2 > (master: lang/php81) In case of PHP 8.0 example its the result of 3 different people support the port. pkubaj and mfechner added _1 and _2 to lang/php80. jbeich added _1 to php80-intl. Nobody of them did something wrong on there own and make everything correct! Its a great example of the complexity of master/slave ports and other constructs. And i am not even sure if this will cause any error (likely not?). I personally would leave them alone and fix them with the next release. Any idea about how to prevent atomic correct commits resulting in wrong overall port-states? Best, Torsten