Re: git-switch(1) then git-pull(1)
- In reply to: Bakul Shah : "Re: git-switch(1) then git-pull(1)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 02:58:43 UTC
On 03/12/2022 02:30, Bakul Shah wrote: >> … >> >> There's the statement after the switch: >> "up to date" >> If the branch is truly updated, then what are the subsequent updates? (The pull immediately after the switch. > The "Your branch is up to date with ..." message by git switch > is confusing but upd to date is merely with respect to the local > .git. It mainly changes .git/index and .git/HEAD mostly. git pull > or fetch" is a separate issue. > OK, keyword: local. Now I understand the need for a separate pull. Thanks. From Git documentation: > The working tree and the index are updated to match the branch. Would it be truer if I imagine this? > The working tree and the index are updated to match the local branch.