From nobody Thu Oct 03 14:21:12 2024 X-Original-To: geom@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XKDPN5zVrz5YNkW for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XKDPN3xHKz4YMN for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1727965272; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CUoYXiiD1ZDrFp+qesFzTNm05Jx0n400AvHRTbM4kTQ=; b=Fm6dV1+5+TEKMYV8swd7PKp8+Dc253yslohiVu97rc47u1x7VMfiRZf9qr77+/68K00pq9 0EMKyh3OI+buxTvSJLaIU/BaYze/SBD29hyq1xbJ9A7Ik8/xPP4oJoDaGVagC7RTXQLd59 +RApUO94Bz77XmL6fwx7pFSNNIJzFYm1lyHtg9Mykgg2j+kS9xexmwfvc3zsZS8WXKwUUO PTW+HKZ7srcscwK0dxxSlOD/l/Vg+MbQRT1r7rGEWplClFwMqm4YMt0cxYV96RPYRQmqZG lKAe8PG8abECBt6sHOqzqQ49TbYG4cDRjKhg2Rw4hBPx+U5iVKrd6/TOp8lo2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1727965272; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rZylzTXpYr/pxHC/VyTG/w5WHNw6Lcb0aPHVynpg7mA125OpAEd02CQ97tn1p/r5oa7OEu N4nOWGMUSjbS+uvDh7SbQ/rlMoKosdoKlG1AbHyHbRx+iAB2Q0kLexhxu09TxnlxPqzdnP U8cpd1ZzHbS7giDKD9z7gMMvWldE86ZX7hQV/Fy3tK08axHLIeh7uko69gh+q1wOVb7GRP 71h0lTH6Ccu+PNQ8dyu2Wf33Rd3CweLo4bx2m1p7me58BmwdGVmz5UK5v9qBgxh8vpwHXY /6nS4jC4YvkHx4Z++mbwKwysSovGR8MGy4JJm30rykAQFn9x1fQ2Wx1afrZLcA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XKDPN3Y7Vzv9Q for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 493ELCgr028974 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:21:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 493ELC3F028973 for geom@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:21:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242747] geli: AMD Epyc+GELI not using Hardware AES Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:21:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ltning-freebsd@anduin.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: geom@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-geom List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242747 --- Comment #34 from Eirik Oeverby --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #33) I can confirm that the performance problems here are absolutely crippling. I honestly assumed this was cleared up by now, but I haven't installed new machines with any significant core counts for a while, so I have not been bitten by it. Can we just Get This Done? The defaults *will* make any new-ish (last 5 yea= rs, at least) AMD machine grind to a halt if it has more than a couple of disks= and uses GELI. I'd think we would rather want to have have suboptimal (but not machine-hanging) performance on Intel over an absolute train crash on AMD as the out-of-the-box experience. /Eirik --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=