Re: RFC reviews for ggate and hastd
- Reply: John-Mark Gurney : "Re: RFC reviews for ggate and hastd"
- In reply to: John-Mark Gurney : "Re: RFC reviews for ggate and hastd"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 01:00:23 UTC
On 09/09/2021 23:33, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Johannes Totz via freebsd-geom wrote this message on Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 21:55 +0100: >> (looks like gmane swallowed my 1st message, trying again) >> >> Hey folks, >> >> any ggate or hastd users here? I've got some code reviews for you. >> Please take a look if you get a chance: >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31727 >> Fix potential out-of-bounds read in the geom-gate kernel module. >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31722 >> Dynamically alloc buffers in ggatec, instead of assuming a fixed size on >> the stack. >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31709 >> Simple rc script to start ggated. > > I'll try to look at them. > > I've broken out the ggate code to: https://www.funkthat.com/gitea/jmg/ggate Nice, thanks! I noticed the http branch. One weekend toy project idea I wanted to get around to was to write a ggated impl that talks to Backblaze. > and have a number of fixes in that tree, one of them being having the > server (ggated) be multi-threaded, to improve IOPs. Another is dropping > the setting of tcp buffer sizes to allow the dynamic buffer sizing code > to work, allowing it to grow larger than 128kB for better perf on high > latency links.. > > In another branch, I have a version that runs the client over ssh using > sftp (requires a modified sftp-server for best performance, and security) > allowing for better security.. > > The ssh branch does have an rc.d script for that. I'll look at which one > should be used, and adapting the man page that I've written for that one > as well. > > Thanks for the help/work! >