Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1
- Reply: Wes Morgan : "Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1"
- In reply to: Chris Ross : "Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 18:35:22 UTC
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 14:21, Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> wrote: > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 > 16506780107187041124 DEGRADED 0 0 0 > 9127016430593660128 FAULTED 0 0 0 external device fault > 4094297345166589692 ONLINE 0 0 0 > 17850258180603290288 ONLINE 0 0 0 > […] > % sudo zpool replace tank 9127016430593660128 /dev/da10 > cannot replace 9127016430593660128 with /dev/da10: already in replacing/spare config; wait for completion or use 'zpool detach’ > % sudo zpool replace tank 9127016430593660128 diskid/DISK-ZGG0A2PA > cannot replace 9127016430593660128 with diskid/DISK-ZGG0A2PA: already in replacing/spare config; wait for completion or use 'zpool detach’ Another related question. I can (and just did) “glabel create” so the “new” disk that is called da10, but is still in chassis drive slot 3 where da3 _used_ to be. Now the new disk can be descirbed as “label/drive03”. This is what I do with ext4 labels on Linux machines on similar hardware. Can I add labels to the ZFS devices without hurting them? glabel says it overwrites the last sector with label information it manages. Is there space on a disk that is used entirely for a ZFS device? - Chris