Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1
- Reply: Freddie Cash : "Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1"
- In reply to: Chris Ross : "Unable to replace drive in raidz1"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 15:43:38 UTC
On 9/6/2024 10:24 AM, Chris Ross wrote: > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 > da3 FAULTED 0 0 0 external device fault > da1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-K1GMBN9D ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-K1GMEDMD ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-K1GMAX1D ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-3WJDHJ2J ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-3WK3G1KJ ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-3WJ7ZMMJ ONLINE 0 0 0 I would triple check to see what the devices are that are part of the pool. I wish there was a way to tell zfs to only display one or the other. So list out what diskid/DISK-K1GMBN9D, diskid/DISK-K1GMEDMD... to diskid/DISK-3WJ7ZMMJ are in terms of /dev/da* actually are. I have some controllers that will re-order the disks on every reboot. glabel status and camcontrol devlist should help verify ---Mike