From nobody Mon Nov 11 20:43:38 2024 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XnM2g29cDz5cb0T for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XnM2g15Dhz4b0h for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1731357819; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8nWtRPHXtLyyceLSktmFRy5LTQ5y37mYjDJzlV0KYP0=; b=nWixuptMPu4c4AkNnrIeVVPjxB5zAxhpPBXPxnidRmbbakHp6aXZDFIXDq9H7DYIsSMEFP zqXcqNfXnP6NuaAJtVI0xDXfRGgIcNksNvwP39DNqM/XuqXGgsBjXX/SCkytdVmBWTwHTE PU8mIKUk1oTWY+DWKQtriIzGSE+fYqutiiiXfnqXvjbcMgPRWxhVpojbd9+5UH1I72NJjV uqMgsbwxrx2F2PG973Ylw+NBdUSz++cqqIz4/ilJ054XwPjx1I4RoAcM1mQlm/Zc3+Yspc 1W1HKeg1FF+XPImjVUJNJbi1Qao2IJjzWM2cphRA2mCKs/pVqLsYj4JbVfFM5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1731357819; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=g9tUCnDSUEx1yVdK7fNhmpTB6i302396NIjD/bXK8gVKB/wi7BkecnqIUzsKLwIKs+TkEs /M9IZ2M0i+51Jttj2cMVUJUBRogMub9vkhJNztUJ0kHwa2Q7cmC/GjeOLDTD8HPPa59M0X KFBmFCUMEnFYkOZz4DE3Z7h7FVX4KjrBOzyj4213iD7QxQCdc57Y73dVX3G/6axl5lZGza BzvoWHsVHpwmAwDuE44DB/PzoTW575dshJ4WXBSUWErg7SqGi85/eAt2oDN51jKvam3qL1 ZNC0HSlZEyNpYtHLDdarkKeNzwX0JGne/Y768RCgDkvZFd/W94zCj2KRYHzo0g== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XnM2g0ZhGzhGy for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4ABKhckZ081704 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:43:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4ABKhcR1081703 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:43:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282449] UFS deadlock with install -S during freebsd-update Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:43:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: Grau_Smue@md5hashing.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282449 --- Comment #17 from vfs-locking --- I may be reading this too broadly, but I ask for the record: Would this risk reducing throughput at (for example) the hard disk level at exactly the time it needs it most? Or is this unavoidable because we've exhausted capacity for handling it the most efficient way? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=