Re: ZFS performance
- In reply to: Dimitry Andric : "Re: ZFS performance"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:04:48 UTC
> On Feb 16, 2024, at 6:49 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > On 16 Feb 2024, at 02:08, joe mcguckin <joe@via.net> wrote: >> >> I have a ZFS fileserver running samba- I ‘m using it as a file server and as a Timemachine backup server. TM work but mit is really slow. >> Are there speed tweaks for ZFS I can apply. Does ZFS have perf monitoring features I can use to characterize the speed? > > Apple's Time Machine is just horrendously slow in general, the host's > file system does not seem to matter at all. If you just copy a regular > file to that SMB share, you should see that it performs well enough. Also not even sure I'd be poking at ZFS at all here - all the stuff I saw about improving TM performance has always focused on bizarre little tweaks to samba, not the underlying filesystem... Charles > > I am still unsure what it is in Time machine that makes it so slow, but > it sometimes seems to stall completely on very small files, and it can > take minutes (!) to copy just a few kilobytes. > > It may help a little to do on the Mac: > > sudo sysctl debug.lowpri_throttle_enabled=0 > > but it won't get significantly faster. People should complain to Apple, > but they will probably just say that FreeBSD with Samba is not an > officially supported use case. :) > > -Dimitry > >