From nobody Fri Apr 19 09:13:54 2024 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VLTTv6d8pz5J9Cs for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VLTTv5Yk1z4hbD for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1713518035; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=FzglbJC/mX8HqXiae+iRFZ5VJtcRVkEoTmssOovqukPX7b1GziBpdBlvSUj7w5G95FIciJ JHm5Z/ncohvUYuF/7i0ppAy933uU345wXxXAsSjvLbE663aj+rWFuD1l3R/1CYxBbmPUeX GmVOmvVsv7I121jblJ2Kjw5McvFBxQaiEx4d0lCwRmUnSg9hbCgUNYBCWq8uR2L/qcGpxv pkUEt5MaP+hMbuNnHpQVl8TZs4RQvO9uc+7+Bp5D4upIO6S8yE1wnHcLQexabsmKFburCJ /2swNGoe//UcrlABr7hVfQVNKjXr8wFKmNTWIB/x0p9W4rp6tZ76VDlrgEOFHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1713518035; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lKQ/Lx65lf5oCKOMbb4QVnZ9p+1mjjljWcNuUxoKbwI=; b=WeYMkcgkiet76FNgyFW9F11XbPeCPLhL2OFuoXmKW42BAjcQAyFTEb/70r4MJI9p3hB3ld ZYeqx6x1nrIHX89O3jGwVBduMs815DxftoklXuh4NG33JktFuGbtiG7JPoUDBBIWIMkc52 xVBb44oGB/voiNOUpmmov3lh4eQFEUf8PYEno8Bn/p0c5aS7Gabh4FjTdpBHaimdXnPQo+ xRj/sQXTykV21MoTDmEZQHKwN6Itk8id6LU4te+wgjqdbNDVnuxKGO48vO2F49rrGHQnzj myyETbkHEDs/u3N216+5qMY7Xh9bmC+yhqD+71TvWEcVrQe+QGYDl9RjWqoLSg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VLTTv57Yfzn5q for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 43J9DtH0069833 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:13:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 43J9DtId069831 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:13:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277197] NFS is much too slow at 10GbaseT Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:13:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: h2+fbsdports@fsfe.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277197 --- Comment #9 from Hannes Hauswedell --- Thank you for the replies and sorry for my late reply (been travelling a lot for work). I am still very interested in debugging this further! @Peter Eriksson It's hopeful to see higher speeds with FreeBSD on other devices at least. > The X540 is a much older network card - around 5 years older than the X71= 0.=20 > I don't have any X540/ixgbe boards here so can't test that combo unfortun= ately, but looking at the feature sets it seems the X540 lacks the LRO feat= ure... Hm, but I do get much higher speeds on Linux, so how can this be a hardware issue? I am not sure whether LRO is the crucial thing here, but at least `ifconfig ix0` on the client does list LRO among its features: # ifconfig -v ix0 ix0: flags=3D1008843 metri= c 0 mtu 9000 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3D4e53fbb ether 98:b7:85:1f:2e:72 inet 192.168.3.80 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=