Re: Understanding locking for buf
- Reply: Alexander Lochmann : "Re: Understanding locking for buf"
- In reply to: Alexander Lochmann : "Re: Understanding locking for buf"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:56:07 UTC
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:54:35PM +0100, Alexander Lochmann wrote: > > > On 20.03.23 19:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:25:30AM +0100, Alexander Lochmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 16.03.23 12:24, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > Is the following correct? > > > > > The aforementioned accesses by 100033 in g_vfs_done() are no violations with > > > > > respect to the locking rule because from a global perspective the buf is > > > > > locked. It is the only concurrent access at that moment. > > > > I would formulate it differently: > > > > No other thread might legitimately get access to the buffer using > > > > either bread() or getblk() until current io operation finishes. > > > > The io operation is handled in two contexts: top-level, where a thread > > > > used getblk() as usual to claim buffer ownership, and completion > > > > thread context (geom up thread). The completion code legitimately > > > > manipulates the buffer, because the top-level code expects that after > > > > the buffer strategy routine is called, effectively moving the ownership > > > > to the geom up thread. > > > Thx. But the top-level thread, using getblk(), legitimately releases the > > > lock. Am I right? > > No. It does not, please re-read what I wrote. > Yeah, but that's what I meant a few mails ago. > The lock is acquired *and* released by the top-level thread. Although some > accesses happen from the geom thread. Sometimes yes, the buffer lifecycle is managed in the way you demonstrated below. I do not understand the goal of this conversation. Can you formulate what you are trying to achieve, please? > > (The numbers are the logged thread ids.) > In our log, I see the following: > - Kernel tries to mount the rootfs via readsuper(). The thread id is 100002. > - 100002 allocates an instance of struct buf. > - The b_lock is acquired by 100002 in buf_alloc(). > - Various accesses to buf by 100002. > - Various accesses to buf by 100033 during g_vfs_done(). > - Again various accesses to buf by 100002. > - The instances is unlocked and freed by 100002. (readsuper() -> > ffs_use_bread() -> brelse() -> buf_free()[ -> BUF_UNLOCK()])