From nobody Tue May 07 17:11:34 2024 X-Original-To: emulation@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VYlDm15S1z5JGZX for ; Tue, 07 May 2024 17:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VYlDl74sgz4d7F for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1715101896; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ifZ7wVlHpf4AD9Q6xgpuN36RDoH+EA+6cY5g9YEFJHmLj0+/1dixubj2gakkAksAShQLHb y/sF127BHhMvovgDwy9g5J13zRE4ff8OxlgBv/QjLPGAStbFzw2SNkN2z3IJVVMnQZiJEj lwBeT3QkpK8lttkCuZQeycmPzBC0mspDULpazHAZW6lNkuSJY+ouU2qVNzD1orgBSppObH rEYfQhXstbH09v7H7UTuXyGErto3nxhALKIrAheztOvGMe3AUJzBAx1qEk70a/OBI89yV0 SwDQqth9Lt10nIEzS3hef1plFtAbDb5DpoKlc/KkeYL2DCJgT0O5vjF2GA9Vkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1715101896; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YTz6FwvyXlTzsk5jE4EZLabKRxDdfGuNbrjnuV3Z/cc=; b=Pjx5dNOAYcCOEOsz1DNOwAKhjzWNCrovm5nH8lrZ0rmeraW9ss9vOeyAfH542hcBm3uXwW Cxn0jPo5+1jQ0URBMBooKnsXWBfTK0UnWnRCYjn4shjcPcGNC15BQfc7tklmfX80/uK2vv ulLcicqCLPzq1E/VqBTNUOxjF07T2kkczekYWN4mbUSAzlx4ebt6rAhJipE13RtqaS/UEO ukfQhS+ii5NNs7iTCq+1H7ZNKkao3Bp+z1spLn/fp72mVwBg7/WevvgnIMVjuV4iMT5b/a 2/YdJ+vivUSa6WMjQ+moB2MOl/8qJTTl/ZCIiMcKJiHQ6y8hg1MkrBnZR0lSGA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VYlDl6gCTzqZr for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 447HBZBe055396 for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:11:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 447HBZMo055395 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:11:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268540] emulators/linux-c7 have too old GLIBC for some software: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.26' not found (required by lwjgl/3.3.1-build-7/liblwjgl.so) Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 17:11:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, tracking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: arrowd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-emulation List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268540 --- Comment #21 from Gleb Popov --- (In reply to Alexander Leidinger from comment #19) Thanks for the review. > pulseaudio doesn't use the FreeBSD config, I assume due to the disable of= shm. I suggest a pkg-message to notify the user that the config is not fal= l-through (and why). That's correct and I don't think this deserves any explanation. The config's content itself makes it obvious why is it needed. > libtracker-sparql has no src rpm listed in the distinfo Fixed. > nspr has no src rpm listed Fixed. > libglvnd has etc config dirs instead of a fall through to FreeBSD, on pur= pose or an oversight? I have no idea, to be honest, but I fixed that. > ca-certificates: the etc part needs to be fall through, having the stock = CAs there in case the user has modified stuff in the corresponding FreeBSD = side is security relevant. I don't have /usr/local/etc/pki and I don't remember having it ever. FreeBSD native nss package doesn't install this directory either. This port also follows its c7 counterpart in this regard. So, I believe, this package shou= ld not fallthrough. > nss: don't know what the etc part specifies, but maybe likewise to the ca= -certificates comment Likewise, I don't think it should fallthrough. > fontconfig: etc and var/db/fontconfig fall through is missing It follows what c7 port does > libusb: I'm surprised about > ... Fixed. > openal-soft: no fall through. I'm on the edge here. A part of me agrees t= o no fall through, a part of me doesn't. Something like pulseaudio is sort = of mainstream and may already be installed on the FreeBSD side (=3D fall th= rough), openal doesn't look mainstream and a missing config may lead to a b= ad user experience. Yes, I also not sure what to do in all these cases. All I know is that all = this stuff is arrange correctly enough to run such heavy applications as Linux Chrome and R7 Office. I'd leave it as it is for now until we bump into problems/bug reports. > dbus-libs and some others: PORTREVISION is set, for some of them I see a = correlation with the rpm name (some kind of package revision there too), bu= t it is handled inconsistently and will diverge in case some port stuff nee= ds to be fixed. No, there is no correlation. We've been running these ports for a long time= at $WORK and decided to upstream this now. I spent a lot of time grooming the history and squashing commits, so these PORTREVISIONs are the remnants of t= his process that I missed. But they don't hurt anyways. > linux-r19: the comment says it's centos Fixed. > vulkan: no fall through > libvdpau: no fall through. Didn't change that for the same reasons. > r7-office + linux-chrome: I suggest to do a separate commit for this, not= as part of the r19 introduction into the ports tree. These are already separate commits in the pull request. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=