From nobody Tue Jun 22 20:40:37 2021 X-Original-To: emulation@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07DD11CACC3 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@portsmon.org) Received: from MTA-05-4.privateemail.com (mta-05-4.privateemail.com [68.65.122.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G8dZb4GS5z4RX7; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@portsmon.org) Received: from MTA-05.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MTA-05.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EB9600A8; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from APP-07 (unknown [10.50.14.157]) by MTA-05.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D265600BE; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 15:40:37 -0500 (CDT) From: "linimon@portsmon.org linimon@portsmon.org" To: Baptiste Daroussin , emulation@freebsd.org, postmaster@freebsd.org Message-ID: <100696449.241898.1624394437401@privateemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210622155842.xaqcwtxnalc3zvbi@aniel.nours.eu> References: <20210622155842.xaqcwtxnalc3zvbi@aniel.nours.eu> Subject: Re: Killing the vbox alias, or making it something different List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-emulation List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev25 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4G8dZb4GS5z4RX7 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > On 06/22/2021 10:58 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I can't find a valid reason to have a vbox alias to emulation@ why > not make emulation@ the maintainer of the vbox software directly? I have no opinion on the matter other than to note that koobs@ and I are currently kicking around ideas about how to restructure assignees. We don't have anything firmed up yet. I guess I would say in _theory_ I would like to retain the possibility of assigning to aliases. But I am not prepared to do any work to make it happen so I don't think my vote counts :-) mcl