Re: Question relationship of builting(1) and functions refrenced through .Xr
- In reply to: Alexander Ziaee: "Re: Question relationship of builting(1) and functions refrenced through .Xr"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 21:24:54 UTC
Hi Alexander, That does give some clarity and do appreciate it. It looks like info(1) needs to go as a link.. I will submit a pull request. But this brings me to a larger question/possible issue: Is there a way to coordinate manual page updates? I see a lot of effort and guidance on the documentation portion but not manual pages. Kind Regards, Chris From: owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org <owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org> on behalf of Alexander Ziaee <concussious@runbox.com> Date: Friday, March 8, 2024 at 3:29 PM To: freebsd-doc <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Question relationship of builting(1) and functions refrenced through .Xr Hi, (Chris Davidson asked) > How does the manual page relationship work > between the builtin(1) manual pages and the > individual .Xr links to other pages Builtin(1) describes shell builtin commands, but the links in this see also section refer to: - pages for valid, discrete programs in the base system with identical names to these builtin commands - the shells supplying the builtin commands - the link that you are looking for, info(1), which we had until FreeBSD 11 [0] and can probably be removed For example, I have a shell builtin 'which' and I also have a '/usr/bin/which'. I investigate suspicious links with that command and whereis(1), but I feel like I need to at least glance over the pages or it gets too meta. [0] https://man-dev.freebsd.org/FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE/info.1 Hope this helps! Alexander Ziaee