[Bug 276850] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 276850] [patch] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 276850] [patch] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 276850] [patch] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 276850] [patch] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 276850] [patch] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 276850] [patch] zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:17:17 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276850 Bug ID: 276850 Summary: zfs-snapshot(8) contains a small error about atomicity when multiple snapshots are created Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Manual Pages Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbayern@law.fsu.edu CC: doc@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 248213 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=248213&action=edit diff for zfs-snapshot(8) man page zfs-snapshot(8) appears to contain a small error. It reads "Snapshots are taken atomically, so that all snapshots correspond to the same moment in time." Per zfs_main.c, which in do_snapshot() simply loops over argv, this does not appear to be correct when multiple snapshots are specified explicitly on the command line. I believe the intent of the man page was to say that *recursive* snapshots are all created atomically. I've submitted a diff for the man page that fixes this error and also adds a small amount of general explanatory information that may be helpful to some readers. The existing statement may confuse some readers anyway, so I've tried to elaborate slightly. (The diff also includes a small amount of insignificant copy editing; for example, "moment in time" is redundant, so I've simply used "moment" instead.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.