[Bug 275876] FreeBSD Handbook: The X Window System: 5.4.3. Video Cards: Use of BusID appears wrong
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 22:29:15 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275876 Bug ID: 275876 Summary: FreeBSD Handbook: The X Window System: 5.4.3. Video Cards: Use of BusID appears wrong Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Books & Articles Assignee: doc@FreeBSD.org Reporter: david@catwhisker.org The section of https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/x11/#x-graphic-card-drivers after "To configure multiple video cards, the BusID can be added. A list of video card bus IDs can be displayed by executing:" shows: The output should be similar to the following: vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 rev=0x07 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x2a42 subvendor=0x17aa subdevice=0x20e4 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller' class = display -- vgapci1@pci0:0:2:1: class=0x038000 rev=0x07 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x2a43 subvendor=0x17aa subdevice=0x20e4 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller' class = display (which is fine), but then shows: Example 6. Select Intel® Video Driver and NVIDIA® Video Driver in a File /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-drivers.conf Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "intel" BusID "pci0:0:2:0" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "nvidia" BusID "pci0:0:2:1" EndSection (which appears to be syntactically incorrect). In my case, the pciconf output is:g1-70(14.0-S)[1] pciconf -lv | grep -B4 VGA vgapci1@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x0416 subvendor=0x1028 subdevice=0x05cc vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller' class = display subclass = VGA -- vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x030000 rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x10de device=0x11fc subvendor=0x1028 subdevice=0x15cc vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'GK106GLM [Quadro K2100M]' class = display subclass = VGA g1-70(14.0-S)[2] When I tried bringing up X11 with no configuration files at all, that failed (as documented in xorg.conf(5), under BusID: "In multi-head configurations, or when using a secondary graphics card in a single-head configuration, this entry is mandatory."). When I tried using the precise syntax from `pciconf -lv` in the BusID, Xorg failed to recognize it at all. The above xorg.conf(5) page documents the syntax for BusID as: | PCI:bus@domain:device:function (e.g., “PCI:1@0:0:0”.... while pciconf(8) documents the displayed "selector" as: | ... Selectors identify a PCI device by its address | in PCI config space and can take one of the following forms: | | • pcidomain:bus:device:function | • pcibus:device:function | • pcibus:device | | In the case of an abridged form, omitted selector components are assumed | to be 0. So: while pciconf may well append a numeral to the literal "pci", that's not a valid syntax for Xorg. And there appears to be a potential for a bit "shuffling" of the selector component IDs. What brought me here is that, now that I have switched from only using x11/nvidia-driver-390 (running stable/12) to also using i915kms (running stable/14), Xorg itself "works," but I no longer have GLX, so I can't even run nvidia-settings (for example): This, from Xorg.log: [ 30222.667] (II) Platform probe for /dev/dri/card0 [ 30222.682] (!!) More than one possible primary device found [ 30222.682] (--) PCI: (0@0:2:0) 8086:0416:1028:05cc rev 6, Mem @ 0xf5400000/4194304, 0xd0000000/268435456, I/O @ 0x0000f000/64, BIOS @ 0x????????/65536 [ 30222.682] (--) PCI: (1@0:0:0) 10de:11fc:1028:15cc rev 161, Mem @ 0xf4000000/16777216, 0xe0000000/268435456, 0xf0000000/33554432, I/O @ 0x0000e000/128, BIOS @ 0x????????/65536 [ 30222.682] (II) LoadModule: "glx" ... ... [ 30222.868] (II) Initializing extension GLX [ 30222.868] (EE) Failed to initialize GLX extension (Compatible NVIDIA X driver not found) [ 30222.868] (II) modeset(0): Damage tracking initialized .... and with stable/14, the i915kms is required in order to get suspend/resume to work on the laptop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.