[Bug 263955] handbook/ports: serving poudriere packages privately

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263955

--- Comment #1 from PauAmma <pauamma@gundo.com> ---
Comment on attachment 233897
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=233897
[patch] serving poudriere packages privately

Thanks for coming back to it. That looks good to me besides the (very minor)
quibble inline below, that's arguably a matter of taste.

>From 0e9a67f6781ed6641a39d1cfc3f41b6aec1b8266 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Jonathan Vasquez <jon@xyinn.org>
>Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 14:00:14 -0400
>Subject: [PATCH] handbook/ports: serving poudriere packages privately
>
>---
> .../content/en/books/handbook/ports/_index.adoc        | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/documentation/content/en/books/handbook/ports/_index.adoc b/documentation/content/en/books/handbook/ports/_index.adoc
>index cfe881e847..7c011abdc9 100644
>--- a/documentation/content/en/books/handbook/ports/_index.adoc
>+++ b/documentation/content/en/books/handbook/ports/_index.adoc
>@@ -1301,6 +1301,16 @@ custom: {
> }
> ....
> 
>+If exposing the package repository to the internet is not desired, the `file://` protocol can be used to point to the repository directly:

I'd say "prefix" instead of protocol here, since it's not a network protocol.

>+
>+[.programlisting]
>+....
>+custom: {
>+	url: "file:///usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/11amd64",
>+	enabled: yes,
>+}
>+....
>+
> [[ports-nextsteps]]
> == Post-Installation Considerations
> 
>-- 
>2.36.1
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.