[Bug 264484] Problem report lifecycle terminology doesn't match current practice.
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264484] Problem report lifecycle terminology doesn't match current practice."
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264484] Problem report guidelines page is out dated and doesn't match current practice"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:08:30 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264484 Bug ID: 264484 Summary: Problem report lifecycle terminology doesn't match current practice. Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any URL: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/pr-guidelines/#pr -lifecycle OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Books & Articles Assignee: doc@FreeBSD.org Reporter: pauamma@gundo.com CC: bugmeister@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(bugmeister@FreeBSD.org) CC: bugmeister@FreeBSD.org I think that: - what it calls "needs triage" is currently called "new" - what it calls "in discussion" is currently called "in progress" - what it calls "patch ready" and "needs MFC") no longer exist or aren't used currently (although see the patch-ready for the former) - what it calls "issue resolved" is currently "closed" with resolution "fixed" but I can't swear to it. While there, maybe review the rest of it for currency. Spotted while rooting around for when/why to MFC info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.