[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in section 10.5.5
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 06:23:16 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261814 Bug ID: 261814 Summary: "union to" should be "union in" in section 10.5.5 Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any URL: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/linuxemu/#l inuxemu-advanced OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Documentation Assignee: doc@FreeBSD.org Reporter: pauamma@gundo.com In 10.5.5. Miscellaneous, "This is, in effect, equivalent to union to file system mounts." should be "This is, in effect, equivalent to union in file system mounts." or maybe "union file system mounts". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.