Re: [LDWG] [FBSD_LDWG] [Ludwig]
- In reply to: Chris Moerz : "Re: [LDWG] [FBSD_LDWG] [Ludwig]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:31:41 UTC
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024, 14:42 Chris Moerz <freebsd@ny-central.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, Graham Perrin wrote: > > > I made a private test post in BSD Cafe, of these three only the > underscore > > works: > > > > #FBSD_LDWG #FBSD-LDWG #FBSD.LDWG > > > > I still like Ludwig, but if there's something like consensus on > FBSD_LDWG I'll > > not argue :) > > Neither will I - it's about helping communications at the end of the day. > > > > > Elsewhere (less BSD-oriented) there'll be more connections between > Ludwig and > > Beethoven. I'm not visiting X :) > > > > I'm not fussed about abbreviations, just kicking the ball around. > Ultimately > > it doesn't affect the work of the group. > > I believe FBSD came up to give it more context. Though I have to say - I'm > not receiving much other mail about Ludwig either, since Beethoven's no > longer around to send newsletters :) > MERRY CHRISTMAS FOLKS :-) :-) :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >