From nobody Mon May 24 15:09:44 2021 X-Original-To: desktop@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23404A782EE for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tcberner@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FpgcN6YN5z4qCf for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tcberner@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id h16so32354979edr.6 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:09:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L2dIChHNCOeTo9TmpdeDv0GR77MeG20LyVDaJAqkuMo=; b=Qn8PuQsZDtZ0nB9CDdrgSEa+hCejrpBGGNI6qE6ORJYHfuLOP8SzWz+er5qqc6PgDH crLn0ftSsZZQHqUjdxKXpNDn2xpVsZhrw3mqejXrRjNZh/XpZPgnvDyuK7icoDsaZNu0 sErZUAYbU6cEbZo96zQvepdKln4shv+wHRN7kLQBtNhZheha3goiYxmkESHgmq2tnTUP C/BHj28UZVmpSula7AMDHG1FL/Bu/4vAiZ7FQ6eDUqoHzY2WkapWQY+X8/XhEjtt59+b 4BBLgRPQKXUGBp+onOquW0s/OQub8s23sZuDDKZaVKeqBrH4DrmyeAFOb0vvVKd6igqu y6nQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LWiGzjHmYDOMbSige3CJbFveh3o86sWhTTHwkfY0kjd6NCgFn TmwUeQ4IkSv9lNJqR1WH+U7odw7kSBenTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwW6qtjwMjmn6RLBoJG6rvRt56U13nVrQtCepcUrOta1H1QCco400RXWghJvjKIi4BAX6fDQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:a404:: with SMTP id u4mr26438291edb.112.1621868995503; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com. [209.85.218.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck28sm2219707edb.63.2021.05.24.08.09.55 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 May 2021 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id b9so7140487ejc.13 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1185:: with SMTP id n5mr23848361eja.342.1621868995232; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-desktop List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47b358f9-7d1e-87fa-b64f-ed307af3744d@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <47b358f9-7d1e-87fa-b64f-ed307af3744d@madpilot.net> From: "Tobias C. Berner" Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 17:09:44 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: lightdm maintainership To: mad@madpilot.net Cc: desktop@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FpgcN6YN5z4qCf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Moin moin In my mind members of xfce@ implying you, are members of desktop@. So feel free to assign it to desktop@ and simply committing to it :) I would love to see some more people commit under the desktop@ hat. mfg Tobias On Sun, 23 May 2021 at 21:53, Guido Falsi via desktop wrote: > > Hi all! > > Recently maintainership for lightdm ports has been put back to the pool > for personal reasons. > > I am keeping the xfce ports updated it is an optional dependency of the > xfce port and a common choice for a display manager. In fact it is what > I usually suggest if asked about it. > > I have been thinking of taking maintainership as myself or as xfce@ for > x11/lightdm and x11/lightdm-gtk-greeter since I use them and they are a > common choice for xfce and I use them. > > Before doing this I thought, since I bet they are a common choice for > other desktop environment users as well, if it would be more appropriate > to assign them to desktop@. Any thought on this? > > Also I can't remember rules for implicit approval to desktop@maintainer > ports. Are people from kde@ xfce@ gnome@ (etc.) automatically included? > > -- > Guido Falsi >