lightdm maintainership
- Reply: Tobias C. Berner: "Re: lightdm maintainership"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 19:53:23 UTC
Hi all! Recently maintainership for lightdm ports has been put back to the pool for personal reasons. I am keeping the xfce ports updated it is an optional dependency of the xfce port and a common choice for a display manager. In fact it is what I usually suggest if asked about it. I have been thinking of taking maintainership as myself or as xfce@ for x11/lightdm and x11/lightdm-gtk-greeter since I use them and they are a common choice for xfce and I use them. Before doing this I thought, since I bet they are a common choice for other desktop environment users as well, if it would be more appropriate to assign them to desktop@. Any thought on this? Also I can't remember rules for implicit approval to desktop@maintainer ports. Are people from kde@ xfce@ gnome@ (etc.) automatically included? -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>