From nobody Sat Jan 04 05:45:23 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YQ8Yk5RlSz5jmDZ for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee) Received: from mail.ketas.si.pri.ee (d004-fea2-0bff-021e-13e8-8437-07d0-2001.dyn.estpak.ee [IPv6:2001:7d0:8437:13e8:21e:bff:fea2:d004]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YQ8Yj4HJCz4ySF for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2025 05:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ketas.si.pri.ee header.s=ketas-si-pri-ee-20240416002854-4096 header.b=wMX4k9+2; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee designates 2001:7d0:8437:13e8:21e:bff:fea2:d004 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=ketas.si.pri.ee X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ketas.si.pri.ee; s=ketas-si-pri-ee-20240416002854-4096; t=1735969528; bh=adA4893UDUYrconwhPitahUM7TQT6866uMFU8wTyrWU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=wMX4k9+2Q9eXSsY0JRsSvoeH0489CPVGVWcBpqn5fK/2wT3EM2W2fZsHo5WtIETcB z2F7HiiLgfAu66iN3qefj3DhSeik3ilyMA0KN9dqLER75DdlSR7m1PU5YOc9ork+KZ X/4SkHanL8HHxIUGKBIi62rM0sDUSwdHYATLi7j8wSRYZ5zVHGNyfq0Jxtxpo7sOZ1 ObhrcqxQsgsvXskfh+Cx1Vy70+upUaky109TeIUfCe0oaAI4B5e9wo6DqN0+DZUmUe TqKvjnSUD+HF5ZQMhiHC7aXQCywAY3p+VGGfz+MddqykfgS5mlV5Kv1/IRlAevEWR0 3b2sfKhIpm0I+L6ZuDheOmNSF4JiKZJVhBWnrBIS5JiszcPWNbxEQNufR6LKCvuT1D q+6+hmd/1GlLwowxn0tt9uOrTkp9uhV6IR629u8n9GkUpfjRMxNctZcuD/owFvAath 68Pyh60qhAe8nx2JZIyJMO5tUKbmMj5EwYW1i1lQN3C65rJjMF8Inm4K+jmyrzuVZO jNfnP6ebwsT2SPET/OqBqL2bBsPG8+sg9Ifrn3MYXQ4X87zhz3N7XVjoaG0w2KUOAJ xjKIng20snbkFrScu2Zu+Dt46J698ETbCumHFGucCrNCoj7z2FH2Ar0ll6jyktRTBy mznVlEhL238N9hO3wv4yWG14= Received: from [IPv6:::1] (0114-0000-0000-0000-13c8-8437-07d0-2001.dyn.estpak.ee [IPv6:2001:7d0:8437:13c8::114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ketas.si.pri.ee (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E9345891CA for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 07:45:27 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 07:45:23 +0200 From: Sulev-Madis Silber To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: getting allwinner h618 soc supported? User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Message-ID: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4YQ8Yj4HJCz4ySF X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.24 / 15.00]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_5(3.00)[d004-fea2-0bff-021e-13e8-8437-07d0-2001.dyn.estpak.ee]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.86)[-0.858]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ketas.si.pri.ee,reject]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:7d0:8437:1300::/56]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ketas.si.pri.ee:s=ketas-si-pri-ee-20240416002854-4096]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3249, ipnet:2001:7d0::/32, country:EE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ketas.si.pri.ee:+] is there anyone working on that? still? anymore? basically i have code for 13=2E2 and hw to test this on but i'm not comfor= table on this field it would be waste of already written code by someone else and interesting,= cheap, available hw that could run fbsd=2E the code needs cleanup, that pa= rt i get=2E on functionality, i can't really comment on i started with uboot, but i couldn't get it built for my board, orange pi = zero 2 w=2E what a bummer=2E was referred to vendor specific fork instead b= y code author i also tried existing fel tools in ports to get working on this, well good= luck with that too should i discard the whole idea and just get h5/h6? right now h3 is quite = awesome for low perf purpose but i want future proof 64bit=2E allwinner fee= ls nice vendor here somehow=2E all open what does anyone think? i'm not quite the guy who should work with this to= o as it's difficult to understand=2E i would prefer writing userland tools = on top of kernel