Re: __cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0x........ from unloaded dso, skipping

On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Dimitry Andric wrote:

> On 26 Jun 2023, at 17:29, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 Jun 2023, at 17:00, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> while building world and current I see a lot of:
>>>>
>>>> __cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0x...... from unloaded dso, skipping
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone shed light on that?
>>>
>>> You need (thanks to Kostik):
>>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=42ceab3ea1a997db93b65404be0ee4b17b5382d7
>>>
>>> Build libc and install it, then the messages should disappear.
>>
>> Great!  Basically update world and it'll go.
>> Do we add an UPDATING note for this or do we consider it developer noise?
>
> I think the message has been there for a long time, but was not often
> noticed. It happened when the buildworld bootstrap decides to build a
> static bootstrap lld ("SYSTEM_LINKER: libclang will be built for
> bootstrapping a cross-linker"), so usually when lld's version is bumped.
> And that is because lld is one of the few threaded build tools in the
> tree.
>
> The messages themselves are harmless and can be ignored. Feel free to
> add an UPDATING note to that effect, otherwise worried users might think
> something is off. :)

And it seems to be back after I updated to main from a few days ago:

During make buildkernel I now see:

...
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xf043d0 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe7bc90 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xf043d0 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe7bc90 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
__cxa_thread_call_dtors: dtr 0xe67c10 from unloaded dso, skipping
...

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                                     r15:7