From nobody Tue Sep 10 10:01:59 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2zl849VCz5VJ04 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royger@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X2zl83jkkz4dSG; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royger@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725962532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=VS8h0XSdLNZgWHNshPJUdWA614RAVvQwCEoyKY9kGfA=; b=I0dXrsCuX5fpK0HSRm1Csxx14U08nbKGtZPlbsMJn/p+omnwoLzm55FVP/N+U44kYWi+m9 BEw8dTH3QvNJCi2U1BcWn+FwMnywvEGQCMxh7sAzGS5rnB5OfQldow0f8RIEhtJI1hz+WV /k0GMuCmwIWVcZjjPUZop5IgJvLJePxFHIlBGXvucx8/o9xCSnF90NdKWNpakFVBmhajeA cuZ+v0SZhTraNsMGdBEiNDPy6JZMM1fsd99G/NnAfr2zw0ImgJuB/6gS5DxevVoLRwBGuZ EzqooFKpkCHHFqXqSwoppE1/DdhvARjQWlipvBnlKU6I8LpnDbXkrtrEO4yz6A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725962532; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EZDVr4uCP73ov+3/DGsLWC/CeorH24ppg040WjrLVdiAU3l4NA46ovMwaxERldGqA6HT+E oJ02hY3Eg2kAHfVk4+oUUzNWi7Wgxfvxv69q0DPzweslw+5IFTbhXjHDXwJlQUj+ahBM7k PIuPfpilCHYeX5mMLZW9HZL9RJzYRx4LZEK1Oq2I2SgFaFs91JNNsfM1luVfhkfZESvCKy VVQU65V2G/109QaRB54yuRF2TyFhVZfurxdo7nZ/h1Fe2trQx5p0g3I2PNzlOpE+7te+Gh 2ykQK3SSCPOc+MQ9XCaKrJD/YDOvs6h6AUB4MVAEAEQp7WWnS8Qo9JDfTA5sYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725962532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=VS8h0XSdLNZgWHNshPJUdWA614RAVvQwCEoyKY9kGfA=; b=Lxv3xzm7DYmNnwEtkuMh8xpFUfnF5lXLgfy0Fyjp1Dy0QlVUGs/kzIEn824+Hvl6jMp60/ G36mjSQX+oZnINW7tbp5JbkoMdhw3oF/W6Z2PhUwkgqRAjvKecTbsJTnNxwiW0Oi/KZNHJ UW/Pkta8XpC5NOlAUdBYjbNhgDR+jKFoJtCZq7J/u/aRvLLeKY9pkI7qMzlKZOALbDPwjD RNYrBJsC4ZRqBJL3nqI51YTs4IEv7gWnFQAVcbr52/RBhop2nkQATDJCntBPpixFG2EpGX aZclyS0FPRA+MGBFLl6OEApvEvTgY420XPkoIQYWddjQuVVWukhuB8jqCjWycQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [213.195.124.163]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: royger) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X2zl80rhfzMtN; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royger@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:01:59 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Brooks Davis , Ed Maste , Li-Wen Hsu Subject: freebsd-15-0-snap image in gcloud likely broken for Cirrus-CI usage Message-ID: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hello, Since a couple of days ago the Cirrus-CI tests using the freebsd-15-0-snap instance have stopped working: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6652828465233920 It doesn't seem like the instance has even started, as the CI job has not managed to start to clone the git repository in order to run the build test. The other tests that use the freebsd-13-3 and freebsd-14-1 images are all working fine. My suspicion is that the new builds from -current are somehow broken, but I don't have a gcloud account myself, so cannot check whether the freebsd-15-0-snap image is working as intended. Maybe someone can take a look and confirm whether the image is OK? Thanks, Roger.