Re: Loader needs to be updated message

From: Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2024 03:31:21 UTC
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024, 9:16 PM Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 19:38:47 -0700
> Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > void <void_at_f-m.fm> wrote on
> > Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 17:27:00 UTC :
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'm more interested in what is there than just what is not
> > > >there. May be show something analogous to:
> > > >
> > > ># gpart list | grep -E '(Name|type|efi|media)'
> > > >1. Name: mmcsd1s1
> > > > efimedia: HD(1,MBR,00000000,0x8000,0x3b68000)
> > > > rawtype: 12
> > > > type: fat32lba
> > > >1. Name: mmcsd1
> > > >1. Name: da0p1
> > > > efimedia: HD(1,GPT,81f199f2-5eb9-11ec-b507-a0cec8d68fdc,0x28,0x82000)
> > > > rawtype: c12a7328-f81f-11d2-ba4b-00a0c93ec93b
> > > > label: BPIM3efi
> > > > type: efi
> > > >2. Name: da0p2
> > > > efimedia:
> HD(2,GPT,efa6f52d-c8ca-11ec-bb1e-03fc0558c84f,0x82800,0x366000)
> > > > rawtype: 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b
> > > > type: freebsd-swap
> > > >3. Name: da0p3
> > > > efimedia:
> HD(3,GPT,71abc138-db5e-11ee-bfe1-e352d1095e3c,0x6861c800,0x732800)
> > > > rawtype: 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b
> > > > type: freebsd-swap
> > > >4. Name: da0p4
> > > > efimedia:
> HD(4,GPT,b568945a-5eba-11ec-b507-a0cec8d68fdc,0xa1c800,0x67c00000)
> > > > rawtype: 516e7cb6-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b
> > > > type: freebsd-ufs
> > > >1. Name: da0
> > > >
> > > >I'll note that on various type of systems, the (effectively)
> > > >ESP need not be specifically of "type: efi", possibly some
> > > >fat variant instead also works. (Of course, EFI need not be
> > > >the only alternative for various type of contexts.)
> > > >
> > > >I'll note the /boot/efi is normally just an empty directory
> > > >that is possibly used as a mount point.
> > > >
> > > >In some (somewhat older) configurations /boot/msdos is
> > > >similarly an empty directory and possibly used as the mount
> > > >point instead.
> > > >
> > > >> After source building to latest stable in the usual way, same error
> message 'loader needs updating'.
> > >
> > > This is on the guest
> > >
> > > # gpart list | grep -E '(Name|type|efi|media)'
> > > 1. Name: vtbd0p1
> > > efimedia: HD(1,GPT,b7731537-61da-11ed-9652-00a0981073a7,0x28,0x400)
> > > rawtype: 83bd6b9d-7f41-11dc-be0b-001560b84f0f
> > > type: freebsd-boot
> >
> > As I understand it, that "type: freebsd-boot" means that one of
> > the likes of:
> >
> > # ls -lodT /boot/gpt*boot*
> > -r--r--r--  1 root wheel uarch  62139 Apr  7 15:55:46 2024 /boot/gptboot
> > -r-xr-xr-x  1 root wheel uarch 109568 Apr  7 15:55:46 2024
> /boot/gptboot.efi
> > -r--r--r--  1 root wheel uarch 176062 Apr  8 01:15:54 2024
> /boot/gptzfsboot
> >
> > is in use inside that freebsd-boot partition (vtbd0p1). But only
> > one of those supports zfs.
> >
> > Fair warning that I never use any of those 3 --nor freebsd-boot
> > partitions. Nor have I ever used Bhyve. Do not blindly believe what I
> > report here. But hopefully it points in a useful direction to
> > initially investigate.
> >
> > Looking at:
> >
> > "man 8 gptboot.efi" indicates that "gptboot.efi works only with UFS
> > root file systems".
> >
> > "man 8 gptboot" indicates that "gptboot is used on BIOS-based
> > computers to boot from a UFS partition on a GPT-partitioned disk".
> >
> > BUT "man 8 gptzfsboot" indicates "gptzfsboot is used on BIOS-based
> > computers to boot from a filesystem in a ZFS pool".
> >
> > So the partitioning is not set up for supporting the combination of:
> > EFI and ZFS-for-root-filesystem: if the gptzfsboot is used then it
> > needs to be old style BIOS-and-ZFS for the context.
> >
> > So my expectation here is that the gptzfsboot content in use in
> > vtbd0p1 (i.e. -i 1 vtbd0 in some commands) is out of date and needs
> > to be updated. To my knowledge, there is no simple technique to look
> > up the vintage present in -i 1 vtbd0 .
> >
> > I have no clue which of the following should be used for your context
> > to be sure that the content ends up up to date:
> >
> > The Protective MBR variant:
> > # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 vtbd0
> >
> > The variant for without the Protective MBR:
> > # gpart bootcode -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 vtbd0
> >
> > Those commands are adjusted variations of what the man page's EXAMPLES
> > section shows, but not using the 2 example's ada0 notation.
> >
> > > 2. Name: vtbd0p2
> > > efimedia:
> HD(2,GPT,b77a2687-61da-11ed-9652-00a0981073a7,0x800,0x2000000)
> > > rawtype: 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b
> > > type: freebsd-swap
> > > 3. Name: vtbd0p3
> > > efimedia:
> HD(3,GPT,b7836ca4-61da-11ed-9652-00a0981073a7,0x2000800,0xdfff000)
> > > rawtype: 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b
> > > type: freebsd-zfs
> > > 1. Name: vtbd0
> >
> >
> > ===
> > Mark Millard
> > marklmi at yahoo.com
>
> FYI:
> boot1.efi works with ZFS. gptboot.efi is basically the one which
> stripped ZFS-related codes from boot1.efi.
>
> And IIUC, boot1.efi shares most codes with loader.efi (except for its
> own FS module wrapper as a consumer, implemented for UFS and ZFS).
>
> It would be deleted in the future (that is your plan, Warner?),
> but currently still usable.
>

That's the plan. There's a number of advanced features it doesn't support
and it doubles the effort for many things..

However it insulates one from loader.efi changes... which some people use...

Warner

-- 
> Tomoaki AOKI    <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
>