Re: sysutils/pam_xdg: Cancelled on -CURRENT

 Hi,

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +0000
Alastair Hogge <agh@riseup.net> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed
> to base[1]. The module in base masks the currently installed Port, the
> man page can be accessed with man -M /usr/local/share/man 8 pam_xdg,
> however, I can now no longer build the Port. I noticed that the base
> module has no WITHOUT_ option, tho, that might be extreme for one
> module, but then again, the base module masks a more feature full
> module. What is the practice to enable use of the Port again? At the
> moment I am updating my host, and testing the following:
> 
> diff --git a/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc
> b/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc
> index f3ab65333f4f..ddbb326f0312 100644
> --- a/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc
> +++ b/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc
> @@ -30,4 +30,3 @@ MODULES               += pam_ssh
>  .endif
>  MODULES                += pam_tacplus
>  MODULES                += pam_unix
> -MODULES                += pam_xdg
> \ No newline at end of file
> 
> 1:
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=6e69612d5df1c1d5bd86990ea4d9a170c030b292
> 
> Thanks.
> 

 I don't see why you can't build the ports.
 Using would be a problem but why do you want to use it now that we
have one in base ?
 Do you have any problems with the one in base ?

 Cheers,

-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>