Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?

Am 2024-03-10 22:57, schrieb Konstantin Belousov:

> We are already low on the free bits in the flags, even after expanding 
> them
> to 64bit.  More, there are useful common fs services continuously 
> consuming
> that flags, e.g. the recent NFS TLS options.
> 
> I object against using the flags for absolutely not important things, 
> like
> this nullfs "cache" option.
> 
> In long term, we would have to export nmount(2) strings since bits in
> flags are finite, but I prefer to delay it as much as possible.

Why do you want to delay this? Personal priorities, or technical 
reasons?

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org    netchild@FreeBSD.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF