From nobody Sat Jun 01 19:13:23 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Vs8lq43N9z5JwW9 for ; Sat, 01 Jun 2024 19:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Received: from mail2.karels.net (mail2.karels.net [3.19.118.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freebsd", Issuer "freebsd" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vs8lq0WpHz4fRg for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from mail2.karels.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by mail2.karels.net (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 451JDNWi013882; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 14:13:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mike@karels.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=karels.net; s=mail2; t=1717269204; bh=jwdX1RwMWdCVX6FwBoiS7/QAtVwdb3jannXuSIX367s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=UgEkiAUOeb1AIazbvHDOAn1OgsNuzflKrtQUtpr20icMNydcDndKqobNYNUx5FzES nzETviIrqMUQ/9hanVEkKJhyw7ydO6xz/vwnSO8TjJpUVHzHusTqWR7VQfF05AV8dQ gv2LP8SuyIgZRzP6KwCPJdOx4/XzkRL+jMrb3HzTRpMYDL1QFV6X8zFE2T8cbAwK5V xMdbz7UXvInkvPRUCLLRmtZtpLqLi3ZbZ1jmhVrruO49DjyAH/rz0a67jhg7qhPalL sM9VsD2v3rT6PPb3haQNIBJFAqa0kjLYgFCZ0scijlbZDtbyjoNS8HzdqsM5tqG1w/ 693CJYoZxs1qQ== Received: from [10.201.1.155] ([137.122.66.15]) by mail2.karels.net with ESMTPSA id IKwaO9NyW2Y4NgAAs/W3XQ (envelope-from ); Sat, 01 Jun 2024 14:13:24 -0500 From: Mike Karels To: void Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: May 2024 stabilization week Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:13:23 -0400 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r6030) Message-ID: <038DCC90-FBB1-4413-80D5-EDB0A0AF53BD@karels.net> In-Reply-To: References: <8DCD6FBB-F913-4D79-8ED4-69D302C31505@karels.net> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:3.16.0.0/14, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Vs8lq0WpHz4fRg On 1 Jun 2024, at 14:00, void wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 08:06:53AM -0400, Mike Karels wrote: >> On 30 May 2024, at 8:31, void wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:24:14PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >>> >>>> Replying to this email thread with your success reports as well >>>> as reporting any regressions is very much appreciated. Thanks! >>> >>> This is new. In the daily security run output (arm64.aarch64): >>> >>> /etc/periodic/security/900.tcpwrap: security_daily_compat_var: not found >>> /etc/periodic/security/900.tcpwrap: security_daily_compat_var: not found -- >> >> There is a new version of pkg that corrects this. > > Unsure what you mean - how would pkg be involved? > > pkg is: pkg-1.21.3 - isn't this the latest? > > The issue occured after a source build of cca0ce62f367 > -- Sorry, this is a different instance of the problem that pkg had with its scripts. This is fallout from removal of security_daily_compat_var. The 900.tcpwrap script was modified for this in April. Did you run etcupdate? Mike