From nobody Thu Jan 25 15:50:31 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TLQJx5Brgz57Vpg for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@igalic.co) Received: from mail-4323.proton.ch (mail-4323.proton.ch [185.70.43.23]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TLQJx3C2Wz4xp8 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@igalic.co) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalic.co; s=protonmail3; t=1706197837; x=1706457037; bh=5HM4e7UMixhg0nRvty63Ak5rUqnvWqhruvCctmKX5LI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=U3CSoendpUkCyEN7xi0bc9aBXwvV5n92Ll3muglNQA7otOsYhQ7dp0w/ZDroPygP4 FreThOD7HRZgUY4d3b0Z3wRcORefz0iWxA9ixwKf83vwznsEBw0kX800+3Ca7eOoMr l1zbLukOW8qE/5jLYruK/Ng3MH4p76zysq2kGrLqkaCrpZk5+5DtTYLh6r4CVGcreJ e7HEJ79PooMmdaWOCUGCCtGmB+MIyL2EL3gTg16QtmdksR6ze1EnKWqey7tMDeo/Cm u4P+z4VTSwVK1fq4OsgVex+F/dfeNXu7HmKBd+toHQejg3gHFD6HWsvPdbG2D6cnE6 1EUHyS0pRa5+A== Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:50:31 +0000 To: "emaste@freebsd.org" , "imp@bsdimp.com" From: =?utf-8?Q?Mina_Gali=C4=87?= Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Re: Removing fdisk and bsdlabel (legacy partition tools) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Feedback-ID: 66573723:user:proton List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TLQJx3C2Wz4xp8 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.43.0/24, country:CH] > > Those are the only users in the tree, but not for long :) > =20 > I have some reviews open to remove some old fdisk / diskabel / > bsdlabel invocations from the tree. > =20 > With those applied, for fdisk I see the following references > (excluding sbin/fdisk/* and comments, old examples, etc.): > =20 > contrib/netbsd-tests/sbin/gpt/t_gpt.sh > tests/sys/cddl/zfs/bin/zpool_smi.ksh > =20 > For bsdlabel / disklabel: > =20 > sbin/growfs/tests/legacy_test.pl > tools/regression/msdosfs/msdosfstest-2.sh > tools/regression/tmpfs/t_vnd > tools/tools/nanobsd/legacy.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/kernel/t_umount.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/kernel/t_umountstress.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/sbin/gpt/t_gpt.sh > sbin/newfs/runtest00.sh > sbin/newfs/runtest01.sh i was looking at cd(4) today, and to my surprise, it was full of disklabel = references. I haven't looked at the code itself yet, to see how far the documentation h= as drifted apart from reality, but to most users, our documentation is real= ity.