Re: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT
- Reply: Rick Macklem : "Re: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT"
- In reply to: Peter Blok : "Re: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:35:44 UTC
Am Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:53:31 +0100 Peter Blok <pblok@bsd4all.org> schrieb: > Hi, > > Forgot to mention I’m on 13-stable. The fix that is causing the crash with automounted NFS > is: > > commit cc5cda1dbaa907ce52074f47264cc45b5a7d6c8b > Author: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> > Date: Tue Jan 2 00:22:44 2024 +0200 > > nfsclient: limit situations when we do unlocked read-ahead by nfsiod > > (cherry picked from commit 70dc6b2ce314a0f32755005ad02802fca7ed186e) > > When I remove the fix, the problem is gone. Add it back and the crash happens. > > Peter > > > On 15 Jan 2024, at 09:31, Peter Blok <pblok@bsd4all.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I do have a crash on a NFS client with stable of today > > (4c4633fdffbe8e4b6d328c2bc9bb3edacc9ab50a). It is also autofs related. Maybe it is the > > same problem. > > > > I have ports automounted on /am/ports. When I do cd /am/ports/sys and type tab to > > autocomplete it crashes with the below stack trace. If I plainly mount ports on /usr/ports > > and do the same everything works. I am using NFSv3 > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > cpuid = 2; apic id = 04 > > fault virtual address = 0x89 > > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff809645d4 > > stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe00acadb830 > > frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe00acadb830 > > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > > current process = 6869 (csh) > > trap number = 12 > > panic: page fault > > cpuid = 2 > > time = 1705306940 > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > #0 0xffffffff806232f5 at kdb_backtrace+0x65 > > #1 0xffffffff805d7a02 at vpanic+0x152 > > #2 0xffffffff805d78a3 at panic+0x43 > > #3 0xffffffff809d58ad at trap_fatal+0x38d > > #4 0xffffffff809d58ff at trap_pfault+0x4f > > #5 0xffffffff809af048 at calltrap+0x8 > > #6 0xffffffff804c7a7e at ncl_bioread+0xb7e > > #7 0xffffffff804b9d90 at nfs_readdir+0x1f0 > > #8 0xffffffff8069c61a at vop_sigdefer+0x2a > > #9 0xffffffff809f8ae0 at VOP_READDIR_APV+0x20 > > #10 0xffffffff81ce75de at autofs_readdir+0x2ce > > #11 0xffffffff809f8ae0 at VOP_READDIR_APV+0x20 > > #12 0xffffffff806c3002 at kern_getdirentries+0x222 > > #13 0xffffffff806c33a9 at sys_getdirentries+0x29 > > #14 0xffffffff809d6180 at amd64_syscall+0x110 > > #15 0xffffffff809af95b at fast_syscall_common+0xf8 > > > > > > > >> On 15 Jan 2024, at 06:46, FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de > >> <mailto:freebsd@walstatt-de.de>> wrote: > >> > >> Am Sun, 14 Jan 2024 20:34:12 -0800 > >> Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com <mailto:Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>> schrieb: > >> > >>> In message <CAM5tNy5aat8vUn2fsX9jV=D9yGZdnO20Q0Ea7qtszx+zSES2bw@mail.gmail.c > >>> <mailto:CAM5tNy5aat8vUn2fsX9jV=D9yGZdnO20Q0Ea7qtszx+zSES2bw@mail.gmail.c> > >>> om> > >>> , Rick Macklem writes: > >>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 12:39=E2=80=AFPM Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws > >>>> <mailto:ronald-lists@klop.ws>>= wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Van: FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de <mailto:freebsd@walstatt-de.de>> > >>>>> Datum: 13 januari 2024 19:34 > >>>>> Aan: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>> > >>>>> Onderwerp: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> running CURRENT client (FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #4 main-n267556-69748e62e82a= > >>>> : Sat Jan 13 18:08:32 > >>>>> CET 2024 amd64). One NFSv4 server is same OS revision as the mentioned cl= > >>>> ient, other is FreeBSD > >>>>> 13.2-RELEASE-p8. Both offer NFSv4 filesystems, non-kerberized. > >>>>> > >>>>> I can crash the client reproducable by accessing the one or other NFSv4 F= > >>>> S (a simple ls -la). > >>>>> The NFSv4 FS is backed by ZFS (if this matters). I do not have physicla a= > >>>> ccess to the client > >>>>> host, luckily the box recovers. > >>>> Did you rebuild both the nfscommon and nfscl modules from the same sources? > >>>> I did a commit to main that changes the interface between these two > >>>> modules and did bump the > >>>> __FreeBSD_version to 1500010, which should cause both to be rebuilt. > >>>> (If you have "options NFSCL" in your kernel config, both should have > >>>> been rebuilt as a part of > >>>> the kernel build.) > >>>> > >>> > >>> Is anyone by chance seeing autofs in the backtrace too? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Hello Cy Shubert, > >> > >> I forgot to mention that those crashes occur with autofs mounted filesystems. Good > >> question, by the way, I will check whether crashes also happen when mounting the > >> tradidional way. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> oh > >> > >> -- > >> O. Hartmann > > > good catch! -- O. Hartmann