Re: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT
- Reply: FreeBSD User : "Re: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT"
- In reply to: Rick Macklem : "Re: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 04:34:12 UTC
In message <CAM5tNy5aat8vUn2fsX9jV=D9yGZdnO20Q0Ea7qtszx+zSES2bw@mail.gmail.c om> , Rick Macklem writes: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 12:39=E2=80=AFPM Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>= > wrote: > > > > > > Van: FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> > > Datum: 13 januari 2024 19:34 > > Aan: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> > > Onderwerp: NFSv4 crash of CURRENT > > > > Hello, > > > > running CURRENT client (FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #4 main-n267556-69748e62e82a= > : Sat Jan 13 18:08:32 > > CET 2024 amd64). One NFSv4 server is same OS revision as the mentioned cl= > ient, other is FreeBSD > > 13.2-RELEASE-p8. Both offer NFSv4 filesystems, non-kerberized. > > > > I can crash the client reproducable by accessing the one or other NFSv4 F= > S (a simple ls -la). > > The NFSv4 FS is backed by ZFS (if this matters). I do not have physicla a= > ccess to the client > > host, luckily the box recovers. > Did you rebuild both the nfscommon and nfscl modules from the same sources? > I did a commit to main that changes the interface between these two > modules and did bump the > __FreeBSD_version to 1500010, which should cause both to be rebuilt. > (If you have "options NFSCL" in your kernel config, both should have > been rebuilt as a part of > the kernel build.) > Is anyone by chance seeing autofs in the backtrace too? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0