Re: noatime on ufs2
- In reply to: void : "Re: noatime on ufs2"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 17:02:50 UTC
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 2:47 AM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote: > I was concerned that email might not work right without atime. > So far, it seems to be working OK. > Depending on how you define "correct". Deliveries won't be affected by atime setting in any way; telling if you have new mail _may_ be affected, but it would be at worst annoying (shell / MUA claims you have new mail while you don't, and even that it's only for their startup, once the shell is running it won't rely on atime). Cheers,