From nobody Wed Feb 21 14:58:26 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TfzwG4gq5z59bqP for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TfzwG07gcz4qdl for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from mips.inka.de (naddy@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1rco4q-007Jzg-8e; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:00:04 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 41LEwRlE011800; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:58:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 41LEwQ58011799; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:58:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:58:26 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber To: Pete Wright Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NLNet Labs Ending Dev of drill(1) Message-ID: References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TfzwG07gcz4qdl X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE] Pete Wright: > I just came across this blog post which seems to indicate that the drill(1) > utility from NLNet is ending development in favor of a rust based tool: > > I was curious if a) anyone was aware of this and b) will we maintain a > version of drill(1) in base or revert to including dns/bind-tools in base? FWIW, OpenBSD has a version of dig(1) in base, with just the parts extracted from BIND that are needed. openbsd$ /usr/bin/dig -v dig 9.10.8-P1 Then again, just keeping the existing version of drill(1) around would amount to the same, I guess. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de