Re: powerd forgets top CPU frequency ?
- In reply to: Matthew D. Fuller: "Re: powerd forgets top CPU frequency ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 17:47:54 UTC
Hi, > On 25 Aug 2024, at 18:01, Matthew D. Fuller <fullermd@over-yonder.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 10:38:14AM +0200 I heard the voice of > Ronald Klop, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> This is interesting by itself. According to the sysctl the CPU only >> has 1 frequency to select, which is 2803, but it is running on 3103. >> Maybe there is some other mechanism which influences the CPU freq on >> your machine. I hope somebody else can shine some light on this. > > This seems fairly common on more recent Intel stuff. On some systems > (without powerd running, since it apparently doesn't do anything > useful in such cases); > > > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 3500/-1 > dev.cpu.0.freq: 1801 > dev.cpu.7.freq_levels: 3500/-1 > dev.cpu.7.freq: 799 > > Xeon E3 v5 (Skylake) > > > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 3500/-1 > dev.cpu.0.freq: 900 > dev.cpu.1.freq_levels: 3500/-1 > dev.cpu.1.freq: 799 > > Xeon E-21xx (Coffee Lake) Another data point: dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2401/100000 2400/100000 2300/93921 2200/88941 2100/84058 2000/79269 1900/74574 1800/69972 1700/64541 1600/60135 1500/55820 1400/51595 1300/47460 1200/43413 1100/38596 1000/34736 dev.cpu.0.freq: 2400 Xeon Silver 4210R (Cascade Lake) (2 packages) …but this system is running 12.2R (and not powerd). Another similar system, running powerd (but only 1 package) shows dev.cpu.0.freq varying between 2400 and 1000 as expected. FWIW these are Intel boards. > Seems to just all be done by the hardware. > > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ > On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. > -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk